Leaders, Leading and Leadership

Jay Conger in his foreword for Leaders Talk Leadership (Ashby, M.D & Miles, S.A; Oxford University Press, 2002) said that " One of the hallmarks of effective leadership in this century will be the capacity to learn and adapt quickly. Years of experience will no longer be enough and, in some cases, may prove a hindrance. The shelf life of knowledge today is simply too short. Instead, a winning characteristic of the new generation of leaders will be its commitment to personal learning and the ability to generate a 'buzz' about learning throughout their organizations. The photographer Walker Evans's advice to novice photographers - " stare, pry, listen, eavesdrop" - will prove sound counsel for today's business leaders"

As far as I am concerned, I see two major lines of thought here from Jay Conger. First, the quality needed in today's leaders is the ability to learn, unlearn and relearn AND ensure the whole organization does this. Second, leaders need to get they hands dirty. Revolutionary thoughts? No. Well accepted? Yes. Practised? Hardly.

I have always and still do find it difficult to accept a CEO or a GM's request to meet his 'Training Manager' or his 'HR Manager' to talk about training and development related matters. I agree that the training manager cum HR manager (as often is the case) do play a critical role in T&D. However, to relinquish the entire responsibility to these two individuals is tantamount to putting in place a road-map for the eventual failure of the organization's T&D initiatives. The reason is simple. Today, the CEO/Chairman/President IS the business. The organization is there to achieve HIS objectives vis a vis the people and resources. Even in a GLC which many people assume wrongly to be a shadow play of the government, a CEO is still the life-blood that will decide the success or failure of its strategies. In other words, the final say (and responsibility for) everything that happens in an organization should lie with its highest decision makers. That includes training and development. These key decision makers must take the time to get involved in determining the T&D needs of the organization. Better still, they must be (once in a while) part of training programs even though the program is for lower level employees. I was pleasantly surprised to facilitate a module in the Bullet Proof Manager program (which is a 12-month long program) for a company whereby the General Manager was also part of the program together with other mid-level managers. This GM, let me add, does not lack in knowledge yet he found the time to be there. I hope there will be more like him or at least there will be more who will at least take the time to bounce their ideas with trainers and learning partners like me.

No matter how big or small an organization is, I believe that T&D is far too important to become the sole domain of the training/HR manager.

In the final analyses, the people are trained and developed to achieve some salient objectives and these objectives will in the end be about the bottom-line. Hence, shouldn't the highest decision makers be actively involved in such an important task?